Enhancing the carbon emission efficiency of the fishery industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and fully leveraging its carbon reduction potential is of significant importance for achieving sustainable development in the fishery economy and the "dual carbon" goals, and the development of carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt's fishery sector plays a crucial leading role nationwide. This paper, from the perspective of the "dual carbon" goals, utilizes social network analysis to thoroughly investigate the spatial network characteristics of carbon emission efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt's fishery sector. Furthermore, it examines the carbon reduction potential in the Yangtze River Economic Belt's fishery sector from an equity perspective, integrating the analysis of fishery carbon emission efficiency. The following conclusion can be drawn. (1) The efficiency of carbon emissions in the fishery sector is characterized by imbalances, with network connectivity showing higher values in the east and lower in the west. (2) The network relationships are characterized by tightness, connectivity, and spatial spillover effects. Network density remains relatively stable, while network transitivity shows an upward trend. There is a high degree of collaboration between regions, and network efficiency still has room for improvement. The three Provinces of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai dominate the network, quickly establishing connections with other provinces, exerting strong control, and acting as nodes and intermediaries. Overall, carbon emission efficiency levels are excellent in the mid-to-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. (3) Beneficiary regions are concentrated in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Bidirectional spillover regions are mainly in the mid-to-lower reaches, broker regions are primarily in some cities in the middle reaches, and net spillover regions are concentrated in the mid-to-upper reaches. Shanghai and Jiangsu have the largest effective scale, the lowest degree of restriction, and the highest node independence, while Anhui and Jiangxi have the smallest effective scale.(4) Regarding the carbon reduction potential in the fishery sector of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the potential in Jiangsu, Hubei, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Sichuan has been continuously declining, while Yunnan's potential has increased, and the potential in the other four provinces has remained relatively stable. (5) According to the Markov chain analysis of the carbon reduction potential in the fishery sector of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the potential is relatively stable when the observation period t=1. As the observation period increases, the probabilities of low, medium-low, and medium-high levels of carbon reduction potential evolving to higher levels increase significantly.
Key words
Yangtze River Economic Belt /
carbon emissions /
carbon reduction potential /
fishery economy
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 甘慧灵,单博文,饶光明.中国城市群碳排放强度的区域差异、分布动态及演化趋势研究[J].中国物价,2024(1):113-118.
[2] 王少剑,高爽,黄永源等.基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J].地理学报,2020,75(6):1316-1330.
[3] 许继军,刘建峰.新时期长江流域生态补偿机制与关键科学问题研究[J/OL].人民长江:1-7[2024-04-26].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1202.TV.20240418.1822.004.html.
[4] Zhao L,Hu R,Sun C.Analyzing the spatial-temporal characteristics of the marine economic efficiency of countries along the Maritime Silk Road and the influencing factors[J].Ocean & Coastal Management,2021(204):105517.
[5] 狄乾斌,陈小龙,苏子晓等.海洋渔业碳排放效率的时空演变及影响因素——以北部海洋经济圈为例[J].生态经济,2024,40(2):109-116.
[6] 高一兰,黄晓野.海洋经济生态系统构建新方法——以海南为例[J/OL].中国国土资源经济:1-13[2024-04-02].https://doi.org/10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000998.
[7] 狄乾斌,邵春雪,陈小龙等.碳汇视角下海洋生态效率的时空差异及影响因素研究——以环渤海地级市为例[J/OL].海洋与湖沼:1-13[2024-04-02].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1149.p.20231218.1747.002.html.
[8] 刘晃,车轩.中国水产养殖二氧化碳排放量估算的初步研究[J].南方水产,2010,6(4):77-80.
[9] 田鹏,汪浩瀚,李加林,刘永超,张海涛,钟捷,龚虹波.中国海洋渔业碳排放时空变化特征及系统动态模拟[J].资源科学,2023,45(5):1074-1090.
[10] 许冬兰,王樱洁.我国沿海渔业碳生产率的区域差异及影响因素[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(2):284-290.
[11] 李晨,冯伟,邵桂兰.中国省域渔业全要素碳排放效率时空分异[J].经济地理,2018,38(5):179-187.
[12] 狄乾斌,陈小龙,苏子晓等.“双碳”目标下中国海洋渔业碳排放效率区域差异及碳减排潜力研究[J].海洋环境科学,2023,42(1):29-37.
[13] Wang Q,Ge Y,Li R.Evolution and driving factors of ocean carbon emission efficiency:a novel perspective on regional differences[J].Marine Pollution Bulletin,2023(194):115219.
[14] 陈雨格,卢泓钢,郑家喜.中国渔业碳排放效率空间关联网络及影响因素[J/OL].中国农业资源与区划:1-13[2024-04-02].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3513.s.20231206.1036.012.html.
[15] Tone K.Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach[J].GRIPS Discussion Papers,2015,1.
[16] 耿晓琴,雷传方,徐虹.基于SNA的晋陕豫黄河板块旅游经济网络结构特征研究[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(5):18-25.
[17] 李梦程,王成新,刘海猛等.黄河流域城市发展质量评价与空间联系网络特征[J].经济地理,2021,41(12):84-93.
[18] 周迪,郑楚鹏,华诗润等.公平与效率协调视角下的中国碳减排潜力与路径[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(1):80-91.
[19] 丁颖辉,杨亚茹.中国省域降碳潜力空间关联网络结构特征及影响因素[J].科技管理研究,2024,44(5):199-208.
[20] 李颖,叶林,李芳.“双碳”目标下的小麦化肥碳减排潜力研究[J/OL].中国农业资源与区划:1-12[2024-04-26].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3513.S.20230803.1832.024.html.
[21] 郑鹏,王欣宇,董春雨.中国海洋渔业绿色效率测度及其空间效应[J].国土资源科技管理,2021,38(6):1-11.
[22] 徐皓,刘晃,张建华等.我国渔业能源消耗测算[J].中国水产,2007(11):74-76,78.
[23] 邵桂兰,孔海峥,于谨凯等.基于LMDI法的我国海洋渔业碳排放驱动因素分解研究[J].农业技术经济,2015(6):119-128.
[24] 张继红,方建光,唐启升.中国浅海贝藻养殖对海洋碳循环的贡献[J].地球科学进展,2005(3):359-365.
[25] 宋金明,李学刚,袁华茂等.中国近海生物固碳强度与潜力[J].生态学报,2008(2):551-558.
[26] 尹剑,龙垚垚,姜洪涛.珠江流域城市工业碳排放效率的空间关联网络特征与影响因素[J/OL].环境科学:1-15[2024-04-18].https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312121.