我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率演变特征及驱动因素分解

李晨, 张申娇

中国渔业经济 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 64-78.

PDF(1060 KB)

微信公众号
ISSN 1009-590X
CN 11-4508/F
PDF(1060 KB)
中国渔业经济 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 64-78.
市场贸易

我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率演变特征及驱动因素分解

  • 李晨, 张申娇
作者信息 +

Evolution characteristics and driving factors of embodied carbon productivity in China's aquatic products export trade

  • LI Chen, ZHANG Shenjiao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在"双碳"目标下,深入研究我国水产品出口贸易中的隐含碳排放及其生产效率,不仅能够准确评估水产品贸易对环境的影响,而且对于促进我国水产品贸易的可持续发展具有重要意义。本文使用投入产出模型测算2007—2021年我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳排放量,同时考虑部分水产品的碳汇减排效应,进一步构建水产品出口贸易隐含碳净生产率指标;借助核密度估计法分析我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率的演变特征与国别流向差异;使用LMDI法将我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率分解为能源生产效率、对外贸易依存度与出口增加值效应三个维度研究其驱动因素。研究结果表明:(1)我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率整体呈“小幅降低—持续升高”特征。存在国别差异,国别差异呈“大幅缩小—持续扩大—基本收敛”趋势。其中,我国对韩国的水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率逐年高于其他贸易伙伴国。(2)我国水产品贸易过程中的碳排放水平已显著降低,但节能减排是以直接能耗降低为主,间接节能减排效果并不明显。(3)能源生产效率是我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率的主要驱动因素;出口增加值效应的驱动作用微弱;出口贸易依存度对水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率具有负向抑制作用。因此,提高能源生产效率,调整水产品出口结构,积极构建以国内大循环为主体的渔业新发展格局是提高我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率的重要路径。

Abstract

Under carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, studying embodied carbon emissions and its productivity of China's aquatic product export trade can not only accurately assess the impact of aquatic products trade on the environment but also holds significant importance for promoting the sustainable development of China's aquatic product trade. This paper used the input-output model to measure the embodied carbon emissions of China's aquatic products export trade from 2007 to 2021, taking into account the carbon sink emission reduction effect of some aquatic products, and further constructed the embodied carbon net productivity index of aquatic products export trade. Subsequently, this study analyzed the evolution characteristics and differences in country-specific flows of the embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic product export trade using the kernel density estimation method. With the help of LMDI method, it decomposed the embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic product export trade into three dimensions: energy production efficiency, foreign trade dependence, and export value-added effect, to study its driving factors. The results show that: (1) The embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic products export trade as a whole exhibits the characteristics of "'slight decrease - continuous increase". There are certain differences among countries, which show a trend of "'substantial narrowing - continuous expansion - basic convergence". And the embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic product export trade to South Korea has been higher than that of other trading partner countries year by year.(2) The carbon emission level in China's aquatic product trade has achieved significant reduction, but energy conservation and emission reduction is primarily focused on the reduction of direct energy consumption, while the indirect energy-saving and emission-reduction effects is not obvious.(3) Energy production efficiency is the main driving factor for the embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic product export trade; the export value-added effect plays a weak driving role; and the export trade dependence has a negative inhibitory effect on the embodied carbon productivity of aquatic product export trade. Therefore, improving energy production efficiency, adjusting the export structure of aquatic products, and actively establishing a new development paradigm of the fishery industry with domestic market as the mainstay are important paths to enhance the embodied carbon productivity of China's aquatic products export trade.

关键词

水产品出口 / 碳汇减排 / 隐含碳生产率 / 驱动因素分解 / 投入产出模型

Key words

aquatic products export / carbon sink emission reduction / embodied carbon productivity / driving factor decomposition / input-output model

引用本文

导出引用
李晨, 张申娇. 我国水产品出口贸易隐含碳生产率演变特征及驱动因素分解[J]. 中国渔业经济. 2025, 43(2): 64-78
LI Chen, ZHANG Shenjiao. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of embodied carbon productivity in China's aquatic products export trade[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics. 2025, 43(2): 64-78
中图分类号: F326.406   

参考文献

[1] 胡剑波,王楷文.中国出口贸易隐含碳生产率演变态势与增长来源[J].西部论坛,2022,32(3):109-124.
[2] 中国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2023 [EB/OL].[2024-10-28].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2023/indexch.htm.
[3] 中国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2005 [EB/OL].[2024-10-28].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2005/indexch.htm.
[4] 许瑶,纪建悦,周乾.中国水产品出口贸易空间格局演变及影响机理[J].地域研究与开发,2023,42(5):1-6.
[5] 李晨,丛睿,邵桂兰.基于MRIO模型与LMDI方法的中国水产品贸易隐含碳排放转移研究[J].资源科学, 2018,40(5):1063-1072.
[6] 戴育琴,冯中朝.中国农产品出口贸易隐含碳排放绩效评价:基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J].江汉论坛, 2017(3): 85-90.
[7] Li W,W Wang,Y Wang,et al.Historical growth in total factor carbon productivity of the Chinese industry-A comprehensive analysis[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,170(1):471-485.
[8] 宋金昭,王添,翟梦倩.我国产业部门隐含碳生产率的俱乐部收敛及成因[J].经营与管理,2023(3):169-178.
[9] 胡剑波,王楷文.中国出口贸易隐含碳生产率演变态势与增长来源[J].西部论坛,2022,32(3):109-124.
[10] 黄凌云,谢会强,刘冬冬.技术进步路径选择与中国制造业出口隐含碳排放强度[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2017,27(10):94-102.
[11] 任亚楠,田金平,陈吕军.中国对外贸易的经济增加值:隐含碳排放失衡问题研究[J].中国环境管理,2022, 14(5):49-59.
[12] 胡剑波,罗志鹏,韩君.中国产业部门隐含碳生产率的测度及其敛散性[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(3):56-69.
[13] 胡剑波,闫烁,韩君.中国产业部门隐含碳排放效率研究:基于三阶段DEA模型与非竞争型I-O模型的实证分析[J].统计研究,2021,38(6):30-43.
[14] LU Z,YANG Y,WANG J.Factor Decomposition of Carbon Productivity Chang in China’s Main Industries:Based on the Laspeyres Decomposition Method[J].Energy Procedia,2014(61):1893-1896.
[15] 尹伟华. 中国出口贸易隐含碳排放强度变动及驱动因素研究:基于CMRIO-SDA模型[J].经济问题探索,2019(12):123-134.
[16] 徐皓,刘晃,张建华等.我国渔业能源消耗测算[J].中国水产,2007(11):74-76.
[17] 徐皓,张祝利,张建华等.我国渔业节能减排研究与发展建议[J].水产学报,2011,35(3):472-480.
[18] Parker R W R,Blanchard J L,Gardner C,et al.Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries[J].Nature Climate Change,2018,8(4):333-337.
[19] 李晨,李昊玉,孔海峥等.中国渔业生产系统隐含碳排放结构特征及驱动因素分解[J].资源科学,2021,43(6):1166-1177.
[20] 张继红,方建光,唐启升.中国浅海贝藻养殖对海洋碳循环的贡献[J].地球科学进展,2005(3):359-365.
[21] 唐启升. 碳汇渔业与又好又快发展现代渔业[J].江西水产科技,2011(2):5-7.
[22] 邵桂兰,孔海峥,于谨凯等.基于LMDI法的我国海洋渔业碳排放驱动因素分解研究[J].农业技术经济,2015(6):119-128.
[23] 张樨樨,郑珊,余粮红.中国海洋碳汇渔业绿色效率测度及其空间溢出效应[J].中国农村经济,2020(10):91-110.
[24] 田鹏,汪浩瀚,李加林等.中国海洋渔业碳排放时空变化特征及系统动态模拟[J].资源科学,2023,45(5):1074-1090.
[25] 狄乾斌,陈小龙,苏子晓等.“双碳”目标下中国海洋渔业碳排放效率区域差异及碳减排潜力研究[J].海洋环境科学,2023,42(1):29-37.
[26] Kaya Y,Yokobori K.Environment,energy and economy:etrategies for sustainability[M].Tokyo:United Nations University Press,1997.
[27] 宋成镇,刘庆芳,马伟等.技术创新对黄河流域地区和长江经济带碳生产率影响路径比较: 基于数字金融的中介效应[J].资源科学,2024,46(3):450-461.
[28] 闫云凤,赵忠秀,王苒.基于MRIO模型的中国对外贸易隐含碳及排放责任研究[J].世界经济研究,2013(6):54,58,86,88-89.
[29] 戴育琴,冯中朝,李谷成.中国农产品出口贸易隐含碳排放测算及结构分析[J].中国科技论坛,2016(1):137-143.
[30] 自然资源部.海洋碳汇核算方法:HY/0349-2022[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2022.
[31] 齐绍洲,付坤.低碳经济转型中省级碳排放核算方法比较分析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,66(2):85-92,129.
[32] 刘传江,赵晓梦.强“波特假说”存在产业异质性吗: 基于产业碳密集程度细分的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(6):1-9.
[33] 张瑛,赵露.中国对美国水产品出口边际影响因素的实证研究[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2018,55(6):54-66.

基金

本文受山东省社会科学规划研究项目“‘双碳’目标下出口贸易隐含碳排放脱钩效应及减排策略研究”(23CJJJ38)资助; 感谢本文匿名审稿人的宝贵建议,文责作者自负

PDF(1060 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/