在加快推进海洋强国建设步伐,实现海洋经济持续稳定发展的背景下,科学评估海洋强国战略对涉海企业全要素生产率的影响,有助于提升海洋相关产业结构的质量和效率。本文基于2007—2022年上市公司中涉海企业的数据,采用双重差分模型对海洋强国建设前后涉海企业全要素生产率水平进行量化评估,并分别从地区异质性、企业所有权异质性、企业金融负债比率异质性三个方面进行实证分析。结果发现海洋强国建设对促进我国涉海企业全要素生产率提高具有显著的正向效应。据此,为促进我国海洋产业发展,提出建议如下:(1)各地区应根据自身的地理位置、资源禀赋等条件,制定符合实际的海洋经济发展策略;(2)加强国有企业的引领与示范作用;(3)针对海洋产业的独特金融需求,创新金融服务模式。
Abstract
Against the backdrop of accelerating the construction of a maritime power and achieving sustained and stable development of the marine economy, scientifically evaluating the impact of the maritime power strategy on the total factor productivity of marine related enterprises can help improve the quality and efficiency of the marine related industrial structure. Based on data from marine related enterprises in listed companies from 2007 to 2022, this article uses a difference in differences model to quantitatively evaluate the total factor productivity level of marine related enterprises before and after the construction of a maritime power, and analyzes them from three aspects: regional heterogeneity, enterprise ownership heterogeneity, and enterprise financial debt ratio heterogeneity. The results showed that the construction of a maritime power has a significant positive effect on promoting the improvement of total factor productivity of China's maritime enterprises. Based on this, in order to promote the development of China's marine industry, the following suggestions are proposed: (1) Each region should formulate practical marine economic development strategies according to its own geographical location, resource endowment, and other conditions; (2) Strengthen the leading and exemplary role of state-owned enterprises; (3) Innovate financial service models to meet the unique financial needs of the marine industry.
关键词
海洋强国 /
涉海企业 /
全要素生产率 /
双重差分法
Key words
maritime power /
maritime related enterprises /
total factor productivity /
double difference method
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 金永明,赵昕,韩立民.“中国建设海洋强国的意义与任务”笔谈[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2022(3):1-8.
[2] 王泽宇,李秦,唐云清等.海洋强国政策效应评估——基于HCW 模型的实证分析[J].地理研究,2023,42(5):1215-1233.
[3] 程曼曼,陈伟,杨蕊.我国海洋经济高质量发展指标体系构建及时空分析——基于海洋强国政策背景[J].资源开发与市场,2022,38(1):8-15.
[4] 杜军,寇佳丽,赵培阳.海洋产业结构升级、海洋科技创新与海洋经济增长——基于省际数据面板向量自回归(PVAR)模型的分析[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(21):137-146.
[5] 贺义雄,张德杰,李福然.基于双重差分法探究海洋强国对海水养殖产业的促进作用[J].海洋经济.2023-11-08网络首发.[DOI]10.19426/j.cnki.cn12-1424/p.20231107.001.
[6] 余璇,沈满洪.海洋强国战略对沿海地区经济增长效应检验[J].统计与决策,2022,38(1):126-130.
[7] 杜小坚,刘强,杨伦庆等.海洋强国战略视角下广东建设海洋经济强省的路径研究[J].科技和产业,2022,22(12):288-296.
[8] 张旭华. 从“海上福州”到海洋强国——中国海洋强国战略的实践探索与理论升华[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020(10):23-32.
[9] 陈韶阳,郑清予.美国海洋思维剖析及对中国海洋强国建设的启示[J].太平洋学报,2021,29(4):53-65.
[10] 吴园涛,段晓男,沈刚等.强化我国海洋领域国家战略科技力量的思考与建议[J].地球科学进展,2021,36(4):413-420.
[11] 钟敬秋,高梦凡,潘婧雪.基于DEA模型的滨海旅游业高质量发展全要素生产率评价研究——以我国 53 个沿海城市为例[J].海洋经济,2021,11(1):80-89.
[12] 郭春娜. 制造业全要素生产率测算及影响因素研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2019,25(2):49-58.
[13] Anzoategui D,Comin D,Gertler M,et al.Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence[J].American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,2019,11(3):67-110.
[14] A H L L,A H Y L,B C H Y.Agglomeration and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China's textile industry -ScienceDirect[J].China Economic Review,2011,22(3):313-329.
[15] 杨莲娜,徐勇.中国自由贸易试验区的进出口贸易效应——基于合成控制法的实证分析[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(3):1-9.
[16] 鲁晓东,连玉君.中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999-2007[J].经济学(季刊),2012,11(2):541-558.